Javier Lorenzo-Calmo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 202220-72318California1,605 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAVIER LORENZO-CALMO, No. 20-72318

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-193-921

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 10, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON and BEA, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Javier Lorenzo Calmo petitions for review of his removal order. The BIA

reached three issues in this case: 1) for asylum and withholding of removal relief,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. whether Lorenzo Calmo showed a nexus between his persecution and his religion,

in particular his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.