Dalila Trejo Gutierrez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 202216-71215California524 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DALILA TREJO GUTIERREZ; et al., No. 16-71215

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A206-911-654

A206-911-655

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Dalila Trejo Gutierrez and her son, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”).1 Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.