Cesar Guzman-Quintanilla v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 202215-73780California381 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR VLADIMIR GUZMAN- No. 15-73780 QUINTANILLA; et al., Agency Nos. A206-773-832 Petitioners, A206-773-833

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Vladimir Guzman-Quintanilla and his minor sister, natives and

citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision

denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.