Casey

Casey v. Hill

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 22, 2022D079221MCalifornia16,285 words

Opinion

Opinion

Do, J.

Filed 6/21/22 (unmodified opinion attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW C. CASEY et al., D079221

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2020- 00046332-CU-EN-NC) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

PATRICE HILL et al., AND DENYING REHEARING

Defendants and Respondents. NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed on May 23, 2022, be modified as follows: 1. On page 9, in the first sentence of the first paragraph, the phrase “(the Act)” is deleted.

2. On page 10, in the second sentence of the first full paragraph, the word “so-called” is deleted and the word “asserted” is inserted in its place.

3. On page 22, the second sentence of the second full paragraph beginning with “Applying those principals” is deleted and the following sentence is inserted in its place:

We apply de novo review and determine the question of personal jurisdiction as a matter of law, based on the uncontradicted facts. 4. On page 26, in the second sentence of the last paragraph beginning with “It reasoned” that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.