Son Hong v. Mary Read

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 202221-55019California673 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SON HONG, No. 21-55019

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-00086-RGK-JC v.

MILDRED GARCIA, et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 21, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Son Hong appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action

alleging various federal constitutional and statutory claims. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure

to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), see Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.