Saul Pelayo v. M. Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 202220-16155California331 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 23 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SAUL PELAYO, No. 20-16155
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-06037-RS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
M. SMITH, Prison Guard Employed with the
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), in her Individual & Official Capacities; et al.,
Defendants,
and
I. SMITH, Prison Guard Employed with the
CDCR, in His Individual and Official Capacities,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Saul Pelayo appeals pro se from the district court’s
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983…