Samuel Cruz-Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 202221-70288California1,517 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL CRUZ-GONZALEZ, No. 21-70288

Plaintiff-Appellant, Agency No. A200-719-734

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Defendant-Appellee.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 13, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and WU,*** District Judge.

Samuel Cruz-Gonzalez (“Cruz-Gonzalez” or “Petitioner”) petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision: (1) affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George H. Wu, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of withholding of removal based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.