Jeremy Pinson v. Barbara Von Blanckensee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 202221-16138California411 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, No. 21-16138

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00584-RM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Jeremy Vaughn Pinson appeals pro se from the district

court’s orders denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging a prison

disciplinary hearing and her motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the denial of a § 2241 petition de novo, see

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Lane v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.