Jeremy Pinson v. Barbara Von Blanckensee
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 202221-16138California411 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 23 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, No. 21-16138
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00584-RM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Jeremy Vaughn Pinson appeals pro se from the district
court’s orders denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging a prison
disciplinary hearing and her motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the denial of a § 2241 petition de novo, see
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Lane v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018), and…