People v. Wilson CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 23, 2022A163946California905 words

Opinion

Opinion

background summarized in this opinion is drawn from the preliminary hearing evidence.

SUMMARY OF RECORD ON APPEAL

In February 2018, Napa Police Detective Garrett Wade registered appellant as a sex offender in Napa County. During his initial interview, appellant reported that he was transient, and that he was living in his car at a Walmart parking lot. Because appellant was a transient, Detective Wade was required to reregister appellant as a sex offender every 30 days. (See § 290.011, subd. (b).) Between February 2018 and January 2021, appellant complied with his registration obligations, and reported that he continued to live as a transient. On January 19, 2021, appellant had an appointment to update his registration. At the time, Detective Wade was registering people over the phone because of the COVID-19 pandemic. On the morning of January 19, a police records specialist called appellant in advance of his appointment with Wade. Appellant reported that his brother had died and he was on a train to Chicago. When Wade called appellant later that day, appellant did not answer. Wade left a message reminding appellant that he needed to update his registration and asking him to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.