People v. Rocha CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Daniel Nino Rocha appealed the sentence imposed
following remand by this court with the direction that the trial court stay the 16-month
sentence on count 3 under Penal Code1 section 654. Upon remand, the trial court vacated
the sentence, and imposed and then stayed an upper term sentence of three years on
count 3. Defendant again appealed, arguing the trial court lacked jurisdiction to increase
the sentence on count 3 from this court’s dispositional order. We agreed, as did the
People, and remanded the matter to the trial court with directions to reduce the term on
count 3 to a stayed 16-month term.
Defendant thereafter successfully petitioned the California Supreme Court for
review. The Supreme Court transferred the case to us with directions to vacate our earlier
opinion and reconsider our decision in light of new sentencing laws. We vacated our
decision and allowed the parties to file supplemental briefs limited to matters arising after
the previous decision in this matter.
In his supplemental brief, defendant contends the matter should be remanded for a
new sentencing hearing because his case is not yet final, and he…