People v. Mendes CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 23, 2022C093550ACalifornia1,412 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/23/22 P. v. Mendes CA3 Opinion following rehearing

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C093550

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 18CF03572, 20CF00924, 20CF05871)

ADAM ROSS MENDES,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Adam Ross Mendes asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We reviewed the entire record and affirmed the judgment. (People v. Mendes (C093550, Jan. 28, 2022) [nonpub. opn.].) After we issued our opinion, defendant filed a petition for rehearing, asking this court to reconsider the appeal in light of newly enacted Senate Bill No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.