Robert Jenkins v. Ted Bloom

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202219-17416California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT LEE JENKINS, No. 19-17416

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-05762-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TED BLOOM; S. CAMPAIGNE; K.

THOMPSON; D. CHAMBERLAIN,

Corrections Captain; K. HOFFMAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Robert Lee Jenkins appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First Amendment

violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.