Robert Jenkins v. Ted Bloom
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202219-17416California286 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT LEE JENKINS, No. 19-17416
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-05762-WHA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TED BLOOM; S. CAMPAIGNE; K.
THOMPSON; D. CHAMBERLAIN,
Corrections Captain; K. HOFFMAN,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Robert Lee Jenkins appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First Amendment
violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.…