Paula Parisi v. Peter Anderson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202220-56150California512 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: PAULA PARISI, No. 20-56150

Debtor, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07775-JVS ______________________________

PAULA PARISI, MEMORANDUM*

Appellant,

v.

PETER C. ANDERSON, United States Trustee for Region 16,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Paula Parisi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). bankruptcy court’s order dismissing her Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the district court’s

decision and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.