Julio Amaral-Lopez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202221-70212California628 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 24 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO AMARAL-LOPEZ, No. 21-70212

Petitioner, Agency No. A063-804-097

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted June 7, 2022 Seattle, Washington

Before: GILMAN,** IKUTA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Julio Amaral-Lopez seeks review of a decision of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ)

denying his application for relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition for review.

Amaral-Lopez’s removal to Mexico pursuant to the Department of

Homeland Security’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.