Hidaya Abdul Razzak v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202217-72015California524 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HIDAYA ATHULLAH ABDUL RAZZAK, No. 17-72015

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-930-501

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted June 8, 2022 Anchorage, Alaska

Before: HURWITZ, BRESS, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Hidaya Athullah Abdul Razzak petitions for review of a decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

1. The adverse credibility determination is supported by substantial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. evidence. See Alam v. Garland, 11 F.4th 1133, 1137 (9th Cir. 2021) (en banc). The

record supports the agency’s finding that Abdul Razzak made…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.