Hidaya Abdul Razzak v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202217-72015California524 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HIDAYA ATHULLAH ABDUL RAZZAK, No. 17-72015
Petitioner, Agency No. A208-930-501
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted June 8, 2022 Anchorage, Alaska
Before: HURWITZ, BRESS, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Hidaya Athullah Abdul Razzak petitions for review of a decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his application for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture
(CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.
1. The adverse credibility determination is supported by substantial
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. evidence. See Alam v. Garland, 11 F.4th 1133, 1137 (9th Cir. 2021) (en banc). The
record supports the agency’s finding that Abdul Razzak made…