David Smith v. County of Santa Cruz
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202220-17238California521 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
JUN 24 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID R. SMITH, No. 20-17238
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-00647-BLF
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 21, 2022**
Before: WALLACE, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges
David Smith appeals from the district court’s dismissal of the civil rights
claims he alleged against the Santa Cruz County defendants. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the dismissal de novo, see Cervantes v.
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2011), and affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court had the discretion to take…