Anibal Silva v. Riverside County Tax Collector

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202221-60037California549 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: ANIBAL MESALA SILVA, No. 21-60037

Debtor, BAP No. 20-1237

------------------------------

MEMORANDUM*

ANIBAL MESALA SILVA,

Appellant,

v.

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TAX

COLLECTOR; MIDFIRST BANK, A

Federally Chartered Savings Association,

Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Gan, Taylor, and Lafferty III, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Chapter 13 debtor Anibal Mesala Silva appeals pro se from the judgment of

the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders

denying his motion for sanctions and motion to vacate its order denying his motion

for sanctions. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.