Anibal Silva v. Riverside County Tax Collector
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 202221-60037California549 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: ANIBAL MESALA SILVA, No. 21-60037
Debtor, BAP No. 20-1237
------------------------------
MEMORANDUM*
ANIBAL MESALA SILVA,
Appellant,
v.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TAX
COLLECTOR; MIDFIRST BANK, A
Federally Chartered Savings Association,
Appellees.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Gan, Taylor, and Lafferty III, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Chapter 13 debtor Anibal Mesala Silva appeals pro se from the judgment of
the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders
denying his motion for sanctions and motion to vacate its order denying his motion
for sanctions. We…