Choe

Choe v. Pressed Down CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2022B313970California2,808 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiley, J.

Filed 6/24/22 Choe v. Pressed Down CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

CHUL LIM CHOE et al., B313970

Plaintiffs and Appellants, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCP00191 v.

PRESSED DOWN, LLC, et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark V. Mooney, Judge. Affirmed.

The Wagner Firm, Avi Wagner and Charissa Morningstar for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jamison Empting Cronin, Kevin D. Jamison, Erin N. Empting, and Justin F. Cronin for Defendants and Respondents.

____________________ Chul Lim Choe and Protech Minerals, Inc. appeal from a judgment confirming an arbitration award. They contend a remedial provision exceeds the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.