People v. Rapisardo CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2022H049117California413 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Procedural Background The prosecution charged Rapisardo with four counts: count 1—robbery in the second degree (Pen. Code, § 212.5, subd. (c))1; count 2—assault with a firearm (§ 245, subd. (a)(2)); count 3—possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1)); and

1 Subsequent undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. count 4—false imprisonment (§ 236). As to counts 1 and 4, the prosecution further alleged Rapisardo personally used a firearm in the commission of the offenses (§§ 12022.5, subd. (a), 12022.53, subd. (b)). As part of a negotiated plea agreement, Rapisardo pleaded no contest to counts 1 and 4. The trial court denied probation and imposed a total term of three years in prison, consisting of the middle term of three years for count 1 and a concurrent term of 364 days for count 4. The court stayed various fines and fees after finding that Rapisardo was unable to pay them. Rapisardo filed a timely notice of appeal and did not request a certificate of probable cause. B. Facts of the Offenses At the preliminary hearing, the victim testified that she and another woman lived in a two-bedroom apartment where they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.