People v. Mandujano CA5
Opinion
Opinion
Smith, J.
Filed 6/24/22 P. v. Mandujano CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
THE PEOPLE,
F078243
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. MCR055511) v.
RAFAEL MANDUJANO, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Ernest J. LiCalsi, Judge. Carlo Andreani, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Respondent. Rob Bonta and Xavier Becerra, Attorneys General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel B. Bernstein, Peter H. Smith, and Cameron M. Goodman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- Rafael Mandujano was found guilty in count 1 of oral copulation and/or digital…