People v. Llamas-Escalante CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2022H049361California4,869 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danner, J.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History On April 26, 2021, the Monterey County District Attorney filed a second amended information (information) charging Escalante with the willful, deliberate, and premeditated murder of Santos Emilio Barriga (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189;2 count 1), four counts of assault with a firearm (§ 245, subd. (a)(2); counts 2–5), and shooting at an inhabited dwelling (§ 246; count 6). Counts 2 through 5 each alleged a different victim, Veronica T., Peyton H., Rico T., and Antonella T., respectively. As to count 1, the information further alleged that Escalante personally used a handgun (§ 12022.53, subd. (b)), personally and intentionally discharged a handgun (§ 12022.53, subd. (c)), and personally and intentionally discharged a handgun causing great bodily injury and/or death to Barriga (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)). As to counts 2 through 5, the information alleged that Escalante personally used a handgun (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)). Lastly, as to count 6, the information alleged that Escalante personally and intentionally discharged a handgun causing great bodily injury and/or death to Barriga (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)). In May 2021, the jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.