United States v. Pieter Van Den Berg

Good Law
5 F.3d 439·93 Daily Journal DAR 12094·1993 WL 370514·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24402·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7126
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 199392-10533California3,390 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Having entered a conditional plea of guilty to violating the Anti-Apartheid Act, Pieter van den Berg appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss the prosecution on the ground of abatement. Because we conclude that the General Savings Statute applies to the Act, we affirm.

I. Facts and Proceedings

Over President Reagan’s veto, Congress passed the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, codified at 22 U.S.C. section 5001 et seq. The Act established United States policy regarding South Africa and imposed significant sanctions against its white minority government. Violations of the sanctions provisions could lead to either civil or criminal liability. 22 U.S.C. § 5113 (b). Congress provided that the subchapter imposing the sanctions (Title III) would automatically “terminate” if the South African government took five steps towards democratization. § 5061(a).

On February 15, 1991 van den Berg was indicted on two counts of importing onion seeds in violation of Title III of the Act, 22 U.S.C. section 5069 (1), and one count of conspiracy to violate the Act. On July 10, 1991, while the prosecution was pending, President Bush signed Executive Order 12769, which declared that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.