John Badea v. United States Parole Commission

Good Law
5 F.3d 534·1993 WL 343102·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30273
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 199393-15315California674 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 534 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John BADEA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-15315. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 2, 1993. * Decided Sept. 9, 1993. Before: REAVLEY, ** PREGERSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 John Badea appeals the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition and the district court's order enjoining him from filing "any further lawsuits relating to his conviction, incarceration, or parole in Case No. CR-S-86-167-HDM." We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated December 17, 1992. We add the following in response to Badea's arguments on appeal. 3 1. While 28 C.F.R. Sec. 2.43(b) provides that "[t]wo years after release on supervision, the Commission shall review the status of each parolee to determine the need for continued supervision," 28 C.F.R. Sec. 2.43(a)(1) further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.