Alexander v. Maass

5 F.3d 534 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Willie D. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendant, Oregon State Penitentiary, Nick Armenakis, Security Manager, Oregon State Penitentiary, and Oregon State Penitentiary Hearings Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36647. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 2, 1993. * Decided Aug. 25, 1993. Before: CHOY, GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges: 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Willie Alexander, an inmate at Oregon State Penitentiary (OSP), appeals pro se the district court's grant of the defendants' motion for summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against prison officials. He contends that his placement in the Disciplinary Segregation Unit (DSU) was improper and that he was denied adequate exercise, visitation rights and access to the courts. We reject his contentions and affirm. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 In May 1988 Alexander escaped from OSP with two other…