Eddie N. Adams v. Kenneth Ducharme

5 F.3d 534 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eddie N. ADAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kenneth DUCHARME, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-36086. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 3, 1993. * Decided Sept. 15, 1993. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, WRIGHT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Adams, a Washington state prisoner, appeals from the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition. Adams contends that the district court erred by denying his petition because the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (Board) deprived him of good time credit in violation of his rights to due process and equal protection. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 2 Adams is serving two consecutive sentences for manslaughter. After a parole violation, the minimum term of confinement for his first sentence was set at his maximum…