Frankie Lee Baker v. Reed Fuller

Good Law
5 F.3d 534·1993 WL 311978·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30284
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 199392-15299California1,602 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 534 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frankie Lee BAKER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Reed FULLER, et al., Defendants/Appellees. No. 92-15299. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 17, 1993. * Decided Aug. 17, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CV-91-00068 TUC ACM; Alfredo C. Marquez, Senior District Judge Presiding. 2 D.Ariz. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 BEFORE: NORRIS and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR ** , District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Frankie Lee Baker appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment concerning a Civil Rights claim of arrest without probable cause. We affirm. Appellees had sufficient probable cause before arresting appellant, and appellees are immune from civil liability for testimony given in the criminal proceedings. Appellant failed to file his state claims within the applicable one-year statute of limitations. Finally, the Court did not abuse its discretion in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.