William Guy Antonelli v. Samuel A. Lewis

Good Law
5 F.3d 534·1993 WL 379833·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30420
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 199392-15108California1,299 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 534 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William Guy ANTONELLI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-15108. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 8, 1993. * Decided Sept. 27, 1993. 1 Before: PREGERSON, BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and TAKASUGI, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 William Guy Antonelli appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 and the denial of his motion to expand the record. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm the district court's denial of both the petition and the motion. I. 4 Antonelli was convicted on one count of third-degree burglary for stealing packages of meat from a market in Pima County, Arizona. Antonelli appealed his conviction to the Arizona Court of Appeals challenging: (1) his arraignment, (2) the State's application of the burglary statute to shoplifting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.