John Oscar Brothers v. United States Parole Commission Mark Henry

5 F.3d 535 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Oscar BROTHERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Mark Henry, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-56222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 24, 1993. Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner John O. Brothers appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas petition challenging the revocation of his parole. The United States Parole Commission found that Brothers violated parole by possessing a firearm, based on his arrest and prosecution (and subsequent acquittal) on state charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm and unauthorized possession of a firearm. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus de novo, Vargas v. United States Parole Comm'n, 865 F.2d 191, 193 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm. SUFFICIENCY…