Ronald S. Burgo v. Edwin T. Shimoda

5 F.3d 535 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald S. BURGO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin T. SHIMODA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-16352. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. Memorandum Filed March 17, 1992. Memorandum Withdrawn Aug. 18, 1993. Decided Aug. 18, 1993. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, FARRIS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The memorandum disposition filed on March 17, 1993 is withdrawn. The attached memorandum disposition is ordered filed. 2 The panel has voted to deny appellant's petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. 3 The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35. 4 The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. 5 MEMORANDUM * 6 Edwin T. Shimoda, Administrator of the Oahu Community Correctional Center,…