No. 91-70665

Good Law
5 F.3d 535
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 1993535California1,501 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 535 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 4 Jose DIAZ-SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70665. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 5, 1993. * Decided Sept. 1, 1993. 1 Before: BEEZER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and ARMSTRONG, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Jose Diaz-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a). The issue before this court is whether the Board abused its discretion by denying Diaz's application for suspension based on failure to establish extreme hardship to himself or his three United States citizen children. Diaz argues that the Board failed to consider all relevant factors relating to the extreme hardship to himself and his children, and that the Board failed to set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.