Debaca v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Opinion
5 F.3d 535 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tina C. DEBACA; James Miner; Elena Anita Moreno, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; Norman Hickey, Chief Administrative Officer of San Diego County; Brian P. Bilbray, County Board of Supervisors; Susan M. Golding, County Board of Supervisors; Leon L. Williams, County Board of Supervisors; John McDonald, County Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55661. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 31, 1993. Decided Sept. 27, 1993. 1 Before: BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, and BOGGS, * Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellants brought a class action on behalf of all Hispanic, African-American, and Asian citizens residing in the County of San Diego against appellees (the County, the members of the County Board of Supervisors, and the County's Chief Accounting Office Director), alleging that the County's 1991…