Gerardo Ramirez Hernandez v. B.J. Bunnell, Warden Dan Lungren Attorney General of California

5 F.3d 536 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gerardo Ramirez HERNANDEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. B.J. BUNNELL, Warden; Dan Lungren; Attorney General of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-56561. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-92-00726-JSL, J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gerardo Ramirez Hernandez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for habeas corpus. Hernandez contends that the jury was not instructed properly and that there was insufficient evidence of premeditation and deliberation to convict him of first degree murder. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and review de novo. Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d…