Raymond Ludwig Frost v. Roger W. Crist Attorney General of the State of Arizona

5 F.3d 536 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond Ludwig FROST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger W. CRIST; Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-15647. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-92-02227-RCB(MS), Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before PREGERSON, BURNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Frost, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 A motion made under Rule 60(b) may be used to challenge the denial of a habeas corpus petition, and timely appeal may be taken from the denial of…