F.D.I.C. v. Slay

Good Law
5 F.3d 536·1993 WL 327843·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30373
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 199392-36576California4,074 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 536 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Alaska National Bank of the North, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lawrence M. SLAY, a/k/a Larry Slay, Defendant, and Louis F. DeLONG, a/k/a Frank DeLong; Juliet DeLong, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-36576. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 1993. Decided Aug. 27, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; No. CV-88-014, H. Russel Holland, District Judge, Presiding. D.Alaska AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMAND. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Louis F. DeLong and Juliet DeLong appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment to the FDIC holding them liable under a guarantee of credit extended by Alaska National Bank of the North to Omega Electric, Inc. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1 3 In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.