Donald Gene Henthorn v. Howard B. Turrentine William Baldwin Maria Arroyo Michael J. McCabe

5 F.3d 536 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald Gene HENTHORN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Howard B. TURRENTINE; William Baldwin; Maria Arroyo; et al.; Michael J. McCabe; Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56328. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 20, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald Henthorn appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 In his complaint, Henthorn alleged that the defendants conspired to violate his constitutional rights by erasing and altering the tape and transcript of a February 2, 1998 pretrial hearing in which the district court judge allegedly made certain preliminary evidentiary rulings favorable to Henthorn and the Assistant United States…