Fagan v. United States

5 F.3d 536 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leslie FAGAN; Josephine Baker; Alice Moore; Mechelle Pizzo; Guy Sutterfield, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; U.S. Air Force; John H. Cunningham, Colonel; Richard B. Cheney, Secretary, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55382. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1993. Decided Aug. 19, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-90-3430-CBM, Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: NORRIS, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiffs, who were contract employees at Edwards Air Force Base, challenge their barment from the base following an Air Force investigation into illegal drug use. Following the barments, plaintiffs were dismissed from their jobs and their security clearances were administratively terminated. They appeal summary judgment in favor of…