Marvin Harris v. M.E. Aoussopaulos

5 F.3d 536 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marvin HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.E. AOUSSOPAULOS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15147. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 16, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marvin Harris, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 prisoner civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's award of summary judgment de novo, T.W. Elec. Serv., Inc. v. Pacific Elec. Contractors Ass'n, 809 F.2d 626 , 629 (9th Cir.1987), and we affirm. 3 Harris contends that the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials. Harris alleged in his complaint that prison officials destroyed or confiscated his personal property in…