F.D.I.C. v. Lands

Good Law
5 F.3d 536·1993 WL 360781·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30356
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 15, 199391-16335California1,165 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 536 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor G. LANDS, M.D., an individual; Geoffrey Lands, an individual; Diana Lands, an individual; Matthew Lands, an individual, Defendants-Appellants. No. 91-16335. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submission Deferred Feb. 2, 1993. Submitted Aug. 27, 1993. Decided Sept. 15, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of California, D.C. No. CV-89-00015-MDC; M.D. Crocker, District Judge, Presiding. 2 E.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: ALARCON, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges 5 MEMORANDUM * 6 The Landses, makers of a promissory note, appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment and judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of the secured party, the FDIC. The district court entered an order of judicial sale, and authorized the imposition of a deficiency judgment against the Lands…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.