Jose Estrada-Linares v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

5 F.3d 536 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose ESTRADA-LINARES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70711. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 16, 1993. * Decided Sept. 15, 1993. 1 Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, I & NS No. Ahs-goa-rjg. INS 2 PETITION DENIED. 3 Before: WOOD ** , REINHARDT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 4 MEMORANDUM *** 5 Jose Estrada-Linares challenges an order of deportation based upon the predecessor to section 241(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (a)(2)(B)(i). 1 Estrada entered the United States as a permanent resident in 1959. In October 1985, he was convicted in Ventura County Municipal Court of having been under the influence of opiates in violation of California Health & Safety Code Sec. 11550(a). Estrada had prior under-the-influence convictions. 6 Under section 241(a)(2)(B)(i) and…