Kevin Roy McKenzie v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
5 F.3d 537·1993 WL 327836·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30409
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 199392-70043California1,218 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kevin Roy MCKENZIE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70043. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 5, 1993. * Decided Aug. 27, 1993. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; No. Aai-xtp-fwc. I.N.S. DISMISSED. Before NORRIS, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kevin Roy McKenzie petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing as frivolous his appeal from an immigration judge's order denying him any form of relief from deportation. Because McKenzie's petition for review was not timely filed with the clerk of our court, we lack jurisdiction. See Lee v. INS, 685 F.2d 343, 343 (9th Cir.1982) (The requirements of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(1) are "mandatory and jurisdictional."). 3 The Immigration and Naturalization Act provides: 4 [A] petition for review may be filed not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.