James D. MacIel v. James K. Rowland, Individually and as Director of the Dept. Of Corrections, State of California Eddie Ylst

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James D. MACIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James K. ROWLAND, individually and as Director of the Dept. of Corrections, State of California; Eddie Ylst, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16136. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 2, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CV-88-01149-GEB; Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. MEMORANDUM ** Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 James D. Maciel appeals pro se the district court's judgment on partial findings in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. The district court held that Maciel failed to establish a prima facie case showing his constitutional rights were violated when he was transferred to New Folsom State Prison (Folsom) from the California Medical Facility (CMF). Maciel contends defendants violated his eighth and…