Siavash Human v. City of Santa Monica

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Siavash HUMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-56357. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CV-92-0025-RSWL(E); Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Siavash Human appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against the City of Santa Monica as time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. Human also appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial and his motion for entry of default judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , 1 and we affirm. 3 * Statute of Limitations 4 We review de novo a district court's dismissal for failure to state a…