Mel M. Marinkovic v. Casey, Gerry, Casey, Westbrook, Reed & Schenek

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mel M. MARINKOVIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CASEY, GERRY, CASEY, WESTBROOK, REED & SCHENEK, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55584. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 6, 1993. * Decided Sept. 13, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CV-88-1146-GT; Gordon Thompson, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: NOONAN, FERNANDEZ and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Marinkovic challenges the district court's setting aside a default judgment in his favor, and its dismissal of this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court dismissed the action on the ground that Marinkovic failed to demonstrate complete diversity of citizenship between the parties, as required by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332 . We affirm. 3 When reviewing a district court's ruling on diversity of citizenship, we review…