Frank H. Martin, Joanne D. Martin v. County of Stanislaus

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank H. MARTIN, Joanne D. Martin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16799. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 14, 1993. Decided Sept. 15, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of California, D.C. No. CV-90-00163-EDP; Edward D. Price, District Judge, Presiding. 2 E.D.Cal. 3 DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART. 4 Before: POOLE and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, KELLEHER, District Judge. * 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 Frank and Joanne Martin appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of Stanislaus County and two Stanislaus County social workers in the Martins' 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that their civil rights were violated because the social workers entered their home without a warrant to investigate allegedly unhealthy living conditions. They also appeal the district court's denial…