James S. McInerney Clara I. McInerney Mario Perez v. Suchai Tang Connie Tang Malee Tang Gordon Tang Eddie Tang

Good Law
5 F.3d 537·1993 WL 312763·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30418
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 199392-15388California2,229 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James S. MCINERNEY; Clara I. McInerney; Mario Perez, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Suchai TANG; Connie Tang; Malee Tang; Gordon Tang; Eddie Tang, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-15388. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1993. * Decided Aug. 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CV-91-02813-JPV, John P. Vukasin, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: KOZINSKI, THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 On June 7, 1990 defendants Suchai Tang, Malee Tang, Connie Tang, Gordon Tang and Eddie Tang (the "Tangs") filed a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, seeking relief from the judgment entered on December 11, 1987 setting aside the trustee's sale of certain property to the Tangs. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.