Colvin McCright v. J.C. Simms, J.C. Jackson, Daniel Vasquez, D. Wooten

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Colvin McCRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.C. SIMMS, J.C. Jackson, Daniel Vasquez, D. Wooten, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15729. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 7, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Colvin McCright, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants, various San Quentin Prison officials, in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Harper v. Wallingford, 877 F.2d 728, 731 (9th Cir.1989), and affirm. 3 A summary judgment must be affirmed "only where 'the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment…