Judith S. Howard v. Military Department, State of California, Air National Guard of California

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Judith S. HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MILITARY DEPARTMENT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Air National Guard of California, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-55632. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 31, 1993. Decided Sept. 13, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, CV-88-0956-KN; David V. Kenyon, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Before: TANG, CANBY, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Judith Howard brought this employment discrimination action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, et seq., against the Military Department of the State of California and the California Air National Guard, alleging that she was subjected to sexual harassment and religious discrimination on the job. She appeals from the district court's order denying her request for appointment of counsel and from its dismissal of her action for…