Jorge F. Martinez v. United States Parole Commission

Good Law
5 F.3d 537·1993 WL 339828·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30404
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 199392-16873California623 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jorge F. MARTINEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-16873. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 2, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jorge F. Martinez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 habeas petition challenging the United States Parole Commission's decision setting a parole release date above his parole guidelines range. We review de novo, Vargas v. United States Parole Comm'n, 865 F.2d 191, 193 (9th Cir.1988), and affirm. 1 BACKGROUND 3 While on parole, Martinez was convicted of conspiracy to import counterfeit federal notes, distribution of cocaine and unlawful use of food stamps. At his parole revocation hearing, the examining committee determined that Martinez had violated his parole and recommended a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.