Arthur S. Katayama v. Heller-White Hotels Company, Inc Ilikai Hotel Investors Limited Partnership Mitchel T. Heller

5 F.3d 537 NOTICE:Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur S. KATAYAMA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HELLER-WHITE HOTELS COMPANY, INC; Ilikai Hotel Investors Limited Partnership; Mitchel T. Heller, Defendant-Appellants. No. 92-16678. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 17, 1993. * Decided Sept. 27, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, No. CV-87-00672-ACK; Alan C. Kay, District Judge, Presiding. 2 D. Hawaii [APPEAL AFTER REMAND FROM 956 F.2d 1167 ]. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: SCHROEDER, T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, CALLISTER, ** District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM *** I. Law of the Case Doctrine 6 Appellant Heller argues that the district court's Supplemental Findings of Fact (SFF) and Conclusions of Law (SCL) were contrary to the law of the case established by this court's Memorandum Disposition of March 5, 1992 (Katayama I ), and exceeded the mandate on remand. 7 "The law of the case doctrine states that the…