Michael C. Meeks v. California Dept. Of Corrections, Michael C. Meeks v. Rosemary Dewitt

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael C. MEEKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants-Appellees. Michael C. MEEKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rosemary DEWITT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 91-56104, 91-55923. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 16, 1993. * Decided Aug. 31, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; No. CV-89-0547, Earl B. Gilliam, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: REINHARDT and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and WOOD, JR., Senior Circuit Judge. ** 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 This is a consolidated appeal from two actions. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1343 and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 , and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . Plaintiff Meeks appeals both the district court's dismissal of one of the defendants and its later ruling in favor of all remaining defendants on a motion for…